The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) is making waves in the legal community with its High Court petition aimed at declaring efforts to dethrone Nakuru Governor Susan Kihika from her position. At the heart of this turbulent case are two contentious episodes that have unfolded like high-stakes drama.
On October 27, 2023, and later on January 23, 2024, the serene surroundings of Nakuru's historic War Memorial Hospital allegedly turned into scenes of chaos. More than 300 patients, some of whom were in critical conditions requiring essential medical support like oxygen, were reportedly evicted in unscheduled evacuations orchestrated by county officials. Imagine lying in a hospital bed, recovering from a surgery or fighting for air, and then suddenly being forced out—that's the scenario painted by these allegations.
The LSK, led by the spirited lawyer Elizabeth Mukira, stands firm on accusing Kihika of tolerating this chaos. The society argues that Kihika didn't just turn a blind eye but actively allowed these raids which shredded the very fabric of constitutional rights such as dignity and healthcare. The Hospital, they note, is under a valid lease renewed as recently as 2021, originating from a lease agreement dating back to 1922. It's a situation as tangled as it is severe, and the losses are claimed to be more than just material—two tragic deaths reportedly followed the incidents.
It's an explosive mix of claims that also point fingers at the Nakuru County Government, the Land Registrar, the National Lands Commission, and the Attorney General as key players in this ongoing drama. The accusations don’t stop there. The LSK also paints a picture of 'goons' allegedly being employed to secure the hospital premises, property destruction, and a blatant disregard for court orders that, if true, would erode trust in local governance itself.
On the defensive side, Kihika's legal team, led by Okore Jayalo, raises eyebrows over the court’s jurisdiction, pointing out an ongoing land dispute in Nyandarua that may be intertwined. Yet, the LSK insists this case transcends mere property debates; it's a glaring breach of constitutional rights begging to be resolved.
All eyes are on Judge Patricia Gichohi, as a critical determination on the objection raised regarding the court's jurisdiction is expected on May 7, 2025. The anticipation is palpable as stakeholders await a decision that could forge new pathways in understanding constitutional accountability.
Amid the legal jargon and intense accusations, the crux remains: Was there a breakdown of governance, and does it make Kihika unfit for office? The outcomes of this case could echo far beyond the walls of a courtroom, challenging the very notions of leadership and dignity.
Comments